Under Armour vs. ASICS: Which Training Shoe Brand Comes Out on Top?

When it comes to training shoes, two brands often come to the forefront: Under Armour and ASICS. Both have carved out significant niches in the athletic footwear market, known for their innovation and performance. Under Armour, founded in 1996 by Kevin Plank, quickly gained a reputation for its cutting-edge sportswear and footwear technology. Their training shoes are celebrated for their sleek designs and advanced features like HOVR cushioning.

On the other hand, ASICS, established in 1949 by Kihachiro Onitsuka, has a long-standing history in producing high-quality athletic shoes. Renowned for their GEL cushioning system, ASICS training shoes are a favourite among athletes for their comfort and durability. In this guide, we’ll been delving into the strengths and weaknesses of both companies. We’ll compare them to help you decide better suited for your needs. So, let’s dive in!

How Does Under Armour Fit?

Under Armour training shoes are crafted to provide a snug, adaptive fit. Many models feature anatomically designed footbeds that conform to the shape of your foot, delivering both support and comfort during workouts. This thoughtful design ensures wearers experience a blend of stability and cushioning, enhancing overall performance.

However, some users have found that Under Armour shoes can run narrow, which might be less comfortable for those with wider feet. To address this, the brand offers wide sizing options in several models, accommodating those with wider feet and ensuring a comfortable fit without sacrificing the performance benefits the brand is known for.

How Does ASICS Fit?

ASICS training shoes are designed to offer a secure and supportive fit, ideal for various training activities. Their shoes often feature the DUOMAX support system, enhancing stability and helping maintain proper alignment during movement. This system is particularly beneficial for those needing extra arch support.

ASICS shoes are known for their snug fit, especially in the heel and midfoot areas, thanks to an external heel clutch that delivers targeted support. The use of adaptive materials allows the shoes to mould to your foot over time, providing a personalised and comfortable fit as you continue to wear them. The GEL technology incorporated in many models further aids foot movement, reducing heel strikes and improving overall comfort. And just like Under Armour, they include wide sizing options in several models, making it easy for those with wider feet to find the right fit.

How Comfortable is Under Armour Compared to ASICS?

When it comes to comfort, both Under Armour vs. ASICS excel, but they do so in different ways, each with its own unique technologies and features.

Under Armour

Under Armour is best known for its HOVR cushioning system, which has become a hallmark of the brand. Although they utilise a variety of cushioning technologies across their shoe lineup, HOVR stands out for its ability to balance softness and responsiveness, absorbing impact and returning energy with every step. This results in a comfortable, slightly springy feel that enhances performance during workouts.

In addition to HOVR, Under Armour shoes often feature breathable mesh uppers that help keep your feet cool and dry during intense sessions. The anatomically designed footbeds in many models adapt to the shape of your foot, offering a more personalised fit for enhanced comfort.

Beyond HOVR, Under Armour incorporates other technologies such as the UA WARP upper, which provides support during dynamic movements, and TriBase technology, which maximises ground contact and improves stability, particularly during weightlifting. These elements work together to create shoes that are both comfortable and functional, making them especially well-suited for gym-focused activities.

ASICS

ASICS is well-known for its GEL cushioning technology, which is celebrated for its superior shock absorption. This feature makes ASICS shoes particularly effective for high-impact activities, providing extra protection during intense workouts. While GEL is a staple in ASICS running shoes, it’s also found in some of their training models to enhance comfort and reduce impact during various exercises.

In addition to GEL, their training shoes often come equipped with Ortholite insoles that maintain their cushioning and support over time. Some models also incorporate FLYTEFOAM, a lightweight cushioning technology that adds comfort without sacrificing durability.

To further boost stability, ASICS integrates DUOMAX support systems, which are especially beneficial for those who need extra arch support. The seamless construction of these shoes ensures a comfortable, irritation-free fit, adding to the overall reliability and comfort that its footwear is known for.

How Durable is Under Armour Compared to ASICS?

When evaluating the performance and durability of training shoes, both Under Armour vs. ASICS bring strong contenders to the table, though they cater to slightly different needs.

Under Armour

Under Armour training shoes are designed with versatility in mind, making them suitable for a range of activities such as running, cross-training, and high-intensity workouts. Their HOVR cushioning system delivers excellent energy return, boosting performance during dynamic movements. The durable rubber outsoles offer reliable traction across various surfaces, with reinforced areas in high-wear zones to increase resistance to wear and tear.

However, its reputation in the running community isn’t as strong as some other brands. Despite the comfort of their uppers and versatility in training, they haven’t garnered much praise for running performance. Some users have noted that while Under Armour excels in gear above the ankles, their shoes don’t quite reach the same level of acclaim. Durability can also be hit or miss, with some reporting that their training shoes fell apart after just a month of use.

That said, Under Armour does have its loyal followers, particularly in the CrossFit community. Shoes like the TriBase Reign and Project Rock lines have proven to be reliable options, though the brand’s lack of marketing investment in these areas has kept them from being top of mind. A bit more commitment to the athletic community could elevate their standing.

ASICS

ASICS training shoes excel in providing consistent performance and durability across different training conditions. Their GEL cushioning system ensures superior shock absorption, making them particularly effective for running and high-impact activities. The durable AHAR outsoles offer exceptional traction, extending the life of the shoes even with regular use.

However, it shifted its focus primarily towards running shoes, leaving behind their once-popular gym training models. Despite this, their court shoes have gained popularity for activities like HIIT and strength training, offering flat soles and excellent ankle stability.

While ASICS may no longer dominate the gym shoe market, their commitment to comfort and performance keeps them in the conversation.

How Much is Under Armour Compared to ASICS?

When comparing the price points of Under Armour and ASICS training shoes, both brands cater to various budgets, offering models across a wide range. Under Armour positions its training shoes in the mid-range category, offering good value for money with features like HOVR cushioning and durable construction. Their premium models, such as the Project Rock series and the TriBase Reign, come with enhanced performance features like improved stability, reinforced materials, and advanced cushioning, reflecting the higher price point.

Similarly, ASICS training shoes also span a broad price range. Known for their comfort and durability, ASICS models equipped with GEL cushioning and high-quality materials are available at competitive prices. Their premium offerings, particularly in lines like GEL-Kayano and GEL-Nimbus, come with specialised support and advanced features, which justifies the higher price point.

The Bottom Line

When it comes to overall performance, ASICS edges out Under Armour as the better choice for most training needs. ASICS offers superior stability and cushioning, making their shoes ideal for both running and high-impact activities. Their consistent support across different types of training gives them the upper hand.

While Under Armour performs well in gym settings, particularly for strength training, ASICS provides a more well-rounded option that caters to a wider range of activities. For most users, the Japanese sportswear company is the one that comes out on top.

Frequently Asked Questions